Lies for salvation in an attempt to prove that the client is a mammoth or as Tinkoff is lying to both the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and the court

Lies for salvation in an attempt to prove that the client is a mammoth or as Tinkoff is lying to both the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and the court

Received objections from Tinkoff in the court and to put it mildly ofigel from Tinkoff’s stupidity and brazen lies

This is what Tinkoff of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation writes

and the same Tinkoff writes the following to the court

Several moments immediately stand out

  1. The Central Bank of the Russian Federation Tinkoff says that the consent was given on November 3, 2023 when entering the Mobile application and provides screenshots of the mobile application, and the same Tinkoff says to the court that the consent was given on the website and provides screenshots of the Internet bank. It turns out Tinkoff can’t decide, where was the consent given? or Tinkoff is simply lying as he breathes

  2. In addition, in the Tinkoff universe, I allegedly on the same day (i.e. 03.11.2023) asked by e-mail to withdraw my consent, while the consent was withdrawn in the Tinkoff universe for some reason not on 03.11.2023 but on 02.02.2024.

Schrödinger’s consent and response to consent are some.

I will leave the other shoals of Tinkoff’s feedback for the trial and publish them later

Question, gentlemen ITshniki.

In what universe is a bank among the 10 largest unable to distinguish between an Internet browser login and a mobile application login? 🙂 Despite the fact that all logins are logged from IP and cookies to the type of operating system, number and name of the browser or mobile application.

My conclusion is simple. Tinkoff simply lied in an attempt to prove the existence of consent to the processing of Biometrics, which of course I did not give.

Related posts